Energy Blue Print

employment effects

  • There are 1 million power sector jobs in the [R]evolution scenario in the Transition Economies in 2010, and 1.1 million in the Reference scenario.
  • Jobs fall sharply in the Reference case after 2010, while growing in the [R]evolution scenario. By 2020, there are 1.1 million jobs in the[R]evolution scenario, 200,000 more than in the Reference scenario.
  • Job numbers continue to fall in the Reference scenario between2020 and 2030, and strong growth continues in the [R]evolution technologies. By 2030 there are 1.2 million jobs in the[R]evolution compared to 0.9 million in the Reference scenario.

Figure 3.30 shows strong growth in the [R]evolution scenario contrasts with continuing job losses in the Reference scenario. It is assumed that only 30% of renewable energy manufacturing occurs within the region at 2010, increasing to 70% by 2030. However, the Transition economies (mainly Russia) export a high percentage of the inter-regionally traded gas, which results in high employment numbers in the Reference scenario, and significant numbers in the [R]evolution.

Over time, the biggest changes are in coal employment, which drops sharply in both scenarios. In the [R]evolution scenario coal employment almost disappears, to be replaced by biomass as the largest employment sector.


Institute DLR, Institute of Technical Thermodynamics, Department of Systems Analysis and Technology Assessment, Stuttgart, Germany
Ecofys BV, P.O. Box 8408, NL-3503 RK Utrecht, Kanaalweg 16-G

Regional Partners: OECD North America WorldWatch Institute; Greenpeace USA Latin America University of Sao Paulo; Greenpeace Brazil; OECD Europe European Renewable Energy Council; Transition Economies Vladimir Tchouprov Africa & Middle East Reference Project: “Trans-Mediterranean Interconnection for Concentrating Solar Power” 2006; Greenpeace Mediterranean; South Asia Rangan Banerjee, Bangalore, India; Greenpeace India; East Asia ISEP-Institute Tokyo; Greenpeace South East Asia; China Prof. Zhang Xilian, Tsinghua University, Beijing; Greenpeace China; OECD Pacific ISEP-Institute Tokyo, Japan; Dialog Institute,Wellington, New Zealand; Greenpeace Australia Pacific; Greenpeace New Zealand